In a legal saga that seems to never end, Judge Aileen Cannon’s recent rulings in Donald Trump’s classified documents case have set off a firestorm of criticism and concern among legal experts.
The controversy stems from Cannon’s directive to submit proposed jury instructions that, according to experts, not only misstate the law but also the facts of the case. This isn’t just a minor misstep—it’s a fundamental failure to grasp basic legal principles that experts say should be a given at this level.
Even MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, known for his staunch defense of the judiciary, couldn’t overlook the gravity of Cannon’s decisions. Her rulings have been described as “mind-boggling” and have left even the most conservative legal circles scratching their heads.
Former prosecutor Kristy Greenberg didn’t hold back in her criticism, highlighting Cannon’s repeated errors, all seemingly favoring Trump. From unnecessarily unsealing witness identities to delaying crucial rulings on established laws like the Espionage Act, Cannon’s courtroom conduct is raising serious red flags.
The latest controversy surrounds Cannon’s insistence on instructing the jury on the Presidential Records Act, despite Trump not being accused of violating it. Legal experts see this as a dangerous precedent that could give Trump carte blanche to declassify at will—even after leaving office.
Cannon’s courtroom is supposed to be a bastion of justice, but her recent actions have cast doubt on that notion. It’s not just about Trump—it’s about the integrity of the legal system itself. With the stakes so high, the spotlight is now firmly on Cannon, and the pressure for accountability in the courtroom has never been greater.
Watch the MSNBC segment below:
