Republicans Plot to Deny Harris Victory and Install Trump as President Regardless of Election Outcome

Staff Writer By Staff Writer

With just days remaining until the November 5 presidential election, concerns are escalating that Republicans are preparing to implement strategies aimed at denying Vice President Kamala Harris a potential victory, should she be declared the winner. At a recent rally at Madison Square Garden, Donald Trump hinted at a “secret plan” involving House Speaker Mike Johnson, raising alarms about possible maneuvers to circumvent official election results.

This “secret plan” appears to involve a strategy to push for a contingent election, where the decision would fall to the House of Representatives should the former president contests the election results. With Republicans holding a slim majority in the House, they could leverage this power to install Trump as president, regardless of the popular vote outcome. Legal experts suggest that even if Democrats challenge such a maneuver, any disputes would likely end up in a Supreme Court dominated by conservative justices, who may be inclined to support Trump.

- Advertisement -

The Republican Party has grown more unified in its backing of Trump’s claims regarding “election integrity” compared to four years ago. His assertions that elections are “rigged” resonate deeply with the party base, especially as many prominent critics of Trump in Congress have either retired or lost influence.

Moreover, Trump’s allies have made significant inroads in state and local election boards, which play a crucial role in vote counting and certification. As Republicans gear up for a potential challenge to Harris’s victory, they are also preparing for a concerted effort to dispute any results that do not favor their candidate.

One Republican strategist observed, “The loyalty to Trump among the base is stronger than ever, which puts pressure on lawmakers to act in accordance with their constituents’ beliefs.” Growing apprehension about election processes, fueled by social media and partisan news outlets, has created an environment ripe for contesting results. Recent reports of alleged voting irregularities have only intensified these concerns.

- Advertisement -

Unlike in 2020, when Trump’s claims of election fraud were met with skepticism from many in Washington, the political landscape has shifted. John Ullyot, a Republican strategist, pointed out that “election integrity” is now a top concern for the party. The Republican National Committee (RNC) has mobilized a vast network of poll watchers and legal teams ready to challenge any election outcomes they don’t like.

“The scale of our ground operations is unprecedented,” Ullyot stated. “This is not just about winning the presidency; it’s about maintaining control in Congress and ensuring that we have a say in how elections are conducted.”

Polling data highlights a troubling trend: many Republicans now trust Trump’s claims about the election more than the assessments of local election officials. An Associated Press/NORC survey revealed that about two-thirds of Republicans are inclined to believe Trump’s campaign over certified results, signaling a significant shift in trust away from traditional electoral processes.

- Advertisement -

Trump continues to assert that any loss would only occur if the election were “corrupt,” further galvanizing his supporters in anticipation of potential disputes. If Harris is declared the winner, it’s likely that Republicans will mount aggressive challenges, employing legislative strategies and leveraging their influence in conservative courts.

In the Senate, the Republican conference has transformed significantly since 2020, with many traditionalists being replaced by Trump-aligned lawmakers. This shift has normalized the acceptance of unfounded claims of widespread election fraud, complicating any objections to electoral outcomes.

As both parties prepare for possible post-election disputes, the parallels to past contested elections are evident. The growing sentiment among Republicans is that they must contest results if they are unfavorable.

Ultimately, the outcome of this election could hinge on the tactical maneuvers in the face of an increasingly divided electorate, setting the stage for a contentious political battle that could extend well beyond Election Day.

- Advertisement -
Share This Article