A recently surfaced secret recording has exposed Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s unfiltered views on the ideological clash in the United States, asserting that “one side must win” and advocating for a return to Christianity in America.
During a conversation at the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual dinner on June 3, Justice Alito discussed the irreconcilable differences between the left and the right. He expressed skepticism about the possibility of peaceful coexistence, given these fundamental conflicts. Alito agreed with his interlocutor’s assertion that the nation should strive to become more godly, stating, “I agree with you. I agree with you.”
These remarks were recorded by liberal documentary filmmaker Lauren Windsor, who attended the event under her real name. Windsor, posing as a religious conservative, engaged Alito in a discussion about the country’s deepening polarization. Alito candidly acknowledged the challenge of bridging these divides, emphasizing that certain differences are too profound to compromise.
The recording (provided below), captures Windsor reminding Alito of their conversation at the previous year’s event. Windsor shared her evolved perspective, expressing doubt about negotiating with the left to end polarization, to which Alito responded:
Don't Miss
“I think you’re probably right. On one side or the other — one side or the other is going to win. I don’t know. I mean, there can be a way of working — a way of living together peacefully, but it’s difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can’t be compromised. They really can’t be compromised. So it’s not like you are going to split the difference.”
Windsor goes on to tell Alito: “People in this country who believe in God have got to keep fighting for that — to return our country to a place of godliness.”
“I agree with you. I agree with you,” replies Alito, who authored the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision, which reversed five decades of settled law and ended a constitutional right to abortion.
In stark contrast to Alito’s partisan stance, Chief Justice John Roberts, also questioned by Windsor at the same event, downplayed the idea of unusual polarization, comparing current tensions to those during the Vietnam War. Roberts emphasized that guiding the nation on a moral path is the responsibility of elected officials, not the judiciary, illustrating the differing philosophies within the Supreme Court.
Alito’s comments are particularly controversial given his and his wife Martha-Ann’s recent flag displays, which have been adopted by right-wing groups contesting the 2020 election results. Alito has dismissed calls for recusal in related cases, attributing the flags to his wife’s preference and denying any political intent.
Windsor, defending her covert recording, argues that such measures are justified to expose the Supreme Court’s lack of transparency and accountability amidst ethics concerns. She aims to shed light on the increasing influence of the Court and its willingness to overturn long-standing precedents, as highlighted in her upcoming documentary, “Gonzo for Democracy.”
The Supreme Court Historical Society, a nonprofit that organizes events where members can interact with justices, has reportedly been a venue for right-wing activists to cultivate relationships with the judiciary. Rev. Rob Schenck, an evangelical leader, has confirmed that encouraging donations to the society was part of a broader strategy to influence conservative justices.
Alito’s outspoken comments add to the scrutiny he faces, particularly after the controversial leak of the Dobbs decision draft. Despite public speculation about the leaker’s motives, Alito has denied any conservative involvement, citing increased security risks for the justices.
Check the recording below:
EXCLUSIVE UNDERCOVER AUDIO:
Sam Alito x John Roberts x The Undercurrent 🧵
1/ Justice Alito admits lack of impartiality with the Left, says: “One side or the other is going to win.” pic.twitter.com/b5nmxToZ9z
— Lauren Windsor (@lawindsor) June 10, 2024
This incident underscores the deep ideological rifts within the highest court and highlights the ongoing struggle over America’s political and moral direction.
