Wisconsin justices are receiving extra police protection after receiving threatening letters from supporters of Donald Trump following a ruling earlier this month that shot down election litigation launched by the President.
The threats prompted Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Patience Roggensack to issue a are Christmas Day statement, warning about “threats of actual or proposed violence” throttled toward at the judiciary, Law & Crime reports.
Roggensack, who was part of the dissent (in favor of Trump), was apparently not interested in standing idly by as her fellow justices were menaced for ruling against the president.
“I am concerned about recent comments aimed at members of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. I acknowledge that all members of the public have the constitutional right to speak in criticism of public servants, which certainly includes all justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. However, no justice should be threatened or intimidated,” She said according to Law& Crime.
“Also, threats of actual or proposed violence have no place in public discourse in a democratic society,” she added.
“As we are about to begin a new year, let us all refocus on coming together where possible and treating those with whom we disagree with the respect that each of us would like to receive,” Roggensack concluded.
The statement arguably applies to comments levied toward multiple justices. Justices Jill Karofsky and Rebecca Dallet have reportedly been subjected to a “torrent of misogynistic and anti-Semitic messages.”
As noted by L&C, “the majority ruling which dismissed Trump’s election case was authored by Justice Brian Hagedorn, the former chief legal counsel to Republican Gov. Scott Walker who went on to win an election to serve on the state’s highest court.”
The New York Times called Hagedorn a “darling of the right” in a recent piece which touched briefly on a certain level of vitriol Hagedorn received after authoring the opinion.
“I’ve been called a traitor. I’ve been called a liar. I’ve been called a fraud,” Hagedorn told the Times. “I’ve been asked if I’m being paid off by the Chinese Communist Party. I’ve been told I might be tried for treason by a military tribunal. Sure, I’ve gotten lots of interesting and sometimes dark messages.”
Hagedorn said he “was pretty consistent” when he ran for office that he “believe[d] deeply that law and politics are not the same thing.”
“Most of us probably have some hope that our preferred candidate or our preferred policies, that the law runs in the same direction, but that isn’t always the case. And I said I was going to be a textualist and an originalist. I believe very deeply in those things,” Hagedorn said further regarding his judicial philosophy. “And I think my decisions have reflected that. And I made clear even when I was running that I would make decisions that I’m sure some folks, certainly conservatives, may not like from a policy outcome and that when I do, I was just following the law. People should know that.”
In another recent interview with WISN-TV in Milwaukee, Hagedorn said he and other justices received “extra police protection” after the court’s narrow majority ruled against Trump. In that interview, Hagedorn said he was “not aware of any specific death threats necessarily.” However, “concerning” statements which he described as “not fun as a father of five children to hear” were directed toward him. He said his 12-year-old daughter asked him if she should play in the back yard rather than the front yard given the comments the justice received.
Trump recently slammed Hagedorn on Twitter over his ruling:
“WOW, he just voted against me in a Big Court Decision on voter fraud (of which there was much!), despite many pages of dissent from three highly respected Justices. One thing has nothing to do with another, but we ended up losing 4-3 in a really incorrect ruling!” Trump tweeted.
…WOW, he just voted against me in a Big Court Decision on voter fraud (of which there was much!), despite many pages of dissent from three highly respected Justices. One thing has nothing to do with another, but we ended up losing 4-3 in a really incorrect ruling! Great…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 21, 2020
